After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 676466 - [abrt] Crash in g_object_unref, async_context_free:camel-folder.c
[abrt] Crash in g_object_unref, async_context_free:camel-folder.c
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: evolution-data-server
Classification: Platform
Component: Mailer
3.2.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-05-21 07:13 UTC by Milan Crha
Modified: 2015-03-10 16:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Milan Crha 2012-05-21 07:13:43 UTC
Moving this from a downstream bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823107

[abrt] evolution-3.2.3-3.fc16: g_type_check_instance_is_a: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

libreport version: 2.0.8
abrt_version:   2.0.7
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        evolution
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_is_a
executable:     /usr/bin/evolution
kernel:         3.3.5-2.fc16.x86_64
reason:         Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
time:           sam. 19 mai 2012 08:59:08 CEST

comment:
:I was replying to an email opened in its own window. Then evolution asked me about closing the previous window.
:I remember clicking on "No" when it crashed.

Core was generated by `evolution'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.

Thread 7 (Thread 0x7fb73552c700 (LWP 2118))

  • #0 read
    at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S line 82
  • #1 read
    at /usr/include/bits/unistd.h line 45
  • #2 unix_signal_helper_thread
    at gmain.c line 4567
  • #3 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 1962
  • #4 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 309
  • #5 clone
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S line 115

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2015-03-10 16:50:49 UTC
No duplicate for a long time, I'm closing this.