After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 593755 - [regression] evolution crashes : print a mail
[regression] evolution crashes : print a mail
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.30.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[dbus]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-09-01 07:18 UTC by Akhil Laddha
Modified: 2011-04-08 05:30 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Akhil Laddha 2009-09-01 07:18:13 UTC 
Evolution 2.29.1  

I didn't reopen bug 593614 as it looks different. Could be due to dbus ? 

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xac0dcb90 (LWP 28775)]
0xb66baf46 in ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
(gdb) t a a bt

+ Trace 217264







Comment 1


Matthew Barnes





          2009-09-01 11:48:22 UTC
        



Seems to be stuck in a EBook photo lookup again.

I don't see the actual segfault in the trace, but it appears to be very deep in libdbus.  Tagging with "dbus-hybrid" (is that still the right tag to use?).






Comment 2


Akhil Laddha





          2009-09-01 12:05:38 UTC
        



(In reply to comment #1)
> Tagging with "dbus-hybrid" (is that still the right tag to use?).

It would be better till 2.30.0 at least as we would like to track/fix dbus related bugs.






Comment 3


Milan Crha





          2009-11-30 13:12:32 UTC
        



There is a very similar crash report in our downstream bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542092

It's only happening in evolution-alarm-notify and is reported on 2.29.2, where is supposed to be the other similar issue from bug #597648 fixed. Let's see how it'll go with GDBus, instead of glib-dbus, I suppose.