After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 579380 - Make Script-Fu procedure browser easier to discover
Make Script-Fu procedure browser easier to discover
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: Script-Fu
2.6.6
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-04-18 06:54 UTC by Charles Belov
Modified: 2009-04-20 06:17 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Charles Belov 2009-04-18 06:54:54 UTC
To find the Script-Fu procedure browser, one has to go to the Script-Fu console and click the Browse button. If one was not planning to go to the console, one might never discover the Script-Fu procedure browser (I discovered it by reading /po-script-fu/en_CA.po).

It would be easier to discover the Script-Fu procedure if the command were added to either the Help or the Script-Fu menu:

<Image>/Help/Script-Fu Procedure Browser
and or
<Image>/Filters/Script-Fu/Procedure Browser


Other information:
Comment 1 Michael Schumacher 2009-04-18 09:29:20 UTC
The produce browser is linked from the help menu.
Comment 2 Charles Belov 2009-04-19 11:41:42 UTC
Ah, yes, I see they are the same thing, with the same number of entries. The correct bug would be to have it not be titled the "Script-Fu Procedure Browser".  Calling it the "Script-Fu Procedure Browser" implies it allows one to examine procedures specific to Script-Fu that cannot be found in the regular procedure browser.  I'll file a different bug to avoid confusion.
Comment 3 david gowers 2009-04-20 06:17:48 UTC
The procedure browser is (and AFAIK always has been) titled 'Procedure Browser'.

The only way you can get any other title is to click on the 'Browse' button in Script-Fu console. Perhaps 'Procedure Browser for Script-Fu' would be a better title for the dialog thus accessed.