After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 571347 - Wrong lock taken by hal-lock
Wrong lock taken by hal-lock
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gparted
Classification: Other
Component: application
0.4.2
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: gparted maintainers alias
gparted maintainers alias
: 572254 574201 576914 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-02-11 20:25 UTC by Jonas Pedersen
Modified: 2009-03-27 17:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Patch to correct hal-lock issue (561 bytes, patch)
2009-02-11 20:26 UTC, Jonas Pedersen
none Details | Review

Description Jonas Pedersen 2009-02-11 20:25:43 UTC
Please describe the problem:
In gparted.in file the lock taken by hal-lock is wrong. The lock taken is "org.freedeskdesktop.Hal.Device.Storage" while it should be "org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage". 

Steps to reproduce:
1. Loot at the source :-)


Actual results:
Lock is not taken and prevention of auto mount is working. 

Expected results:
That the correct lock was taken and auto mount was prevented. 

Does this happen every time?
Yes

Other information:
Comment 1 Jonas Pedersen 2009-02-11 20:26:29 UTC
Created attachment 128492 [details] [review]
Patch to correct hal-lock issue
Comment 2 Curtis Gedak 2009-02-11 21:54:04 UTC
Thank you very much Jonas for reporting this problem.

This is something that really needed a second pair of eyes to see.  :-)
I didn't notice that "freedeskdesktop" was misspelled.

I will see about including this fix soon.
Comment 3 Curtis Gedak 2009-02-11 22:10:11 UTC
The fix for this problem has been committed to the Gnome SVN repository for inclusion in the next release of GParted (0.4.3).

Closing this bug.
Comment 4 Curtis Gedak 2009-02-18 16:06:03 UTC
*** Bug 572254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Curtis Gedak 2009-03-23 22:52:23 UTC
*** Bug 574201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Curtis Gedak 2009-03-27 17:23:22 UTC
*** Bug 576914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***