After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 499644 - Reversed meaning on "Include remote tests" in SA junk mail plugin
Reversed meaning on "Include remote tests" in SA junk mail plugin
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.22.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 495265 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-11-26 00:57 UTC by Matthew Barnes
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Proposed patch (1.16 KB, patch)
2007-11-26 01:00 UTC, Matthew Barnes
accepted-commit_now Details | Review

Description Matthew Barnes 2007-11-26 00:57:30 UTC
Forwarding from a downstream bug report:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398211

There is a config option (a checkbox) in the Junk mail settings, which is called
"Include remote tests" for the Spamassassin mail filter. Corresponding gconf
variable is "/apps/evolution/mail/junk/sa/local_only". But they are in the
opposition - when "Include remote tests" is checked, then "local_only" is set
too and looks like that only local tests are done. When unchecking, then the
filtering process takes longer and is also more precise.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-2.12.1-3.fc8
evolution-2.21.2-2.fc9

The source file is evolution/plugins/sa-junk-plugins/em-junk-filter.c
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2007-11-26 01:00:33 UTC
Created attachment 99639 [details] [review]
Proposed patch
Comment 2 Srinivasa Ragavan 2007-11-26 03:35:10 UTC
I think you just fixed 'wth spamassasin is slow with Evolution' :) 

Commit to head/stable
Comment 3 Matthew Barnes 2007-11-26 14:15:53 UTC
Committed to trunk (revision 34586) and gnome-2-20 branch (revision 34587).
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-27 03:35:56 UTC
*** Bug 495265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***