After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 318256 - tiny-fu takes a looong time to start
tiny-fu takes a looong time to start
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 374854
Product: gimp-tiny-fu
Classification: Other
Component: General
1.0
Other All
: Low minor
: future
Assigned To: GIMP Tiny-fu plug-in maintainer alias
GIMP Tiny-fu plug-in maintainer alias
: 345736 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-10-07 21:51 UTC by Eric Lamarque
Modified: 2007-04-16 16:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Eric Lamarque 2005-10-07 21:51:35 UTC 
Version details: 1.0.1
Distribution/Version: Solaris 8

I just download tiny-fu 1.0.1 and the plugin takes a very long time to
initialize itself compared to script-fu. Not sure if its related to script
checking or internatinalization.

Anyway, the system is a Solaris/Sparc (SunBlade 100/256Mb) and the OS release is
a bit outdated (no locale in libc) but other plugins go through this problem
faster too.
Comment 1 Kevin Cozens 2005-10-13 20:02:37 UTC 
UTF-8 support added some overhead to the parsing of scripts. Also some Scheme
functions (ie. caar) are implemented via a library of Scheme code instead of in
C. This adds flexibility and allows for some things to be changed/fixed without
the need to recompile the plug-in.

The current emphasis is on making sure the plug-in is working properly and
getting a release for with the current version of GIMP. Reducing start up time
will be something for post 1.2 versions. Changing the plug-in along the lines
suggested in bug 311726 would also reduce the start up time.
Comment 2 Kevin Cozens 2006-06-23 13:48:00 UTC 
*** Bug 345736 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Eric Lamarque 2007-04-16 16:40:53 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 374854 ***