After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 314986 - Crash when refreshing simple (pdflatex generated) pdf
Crash when refreshing simple (pdflatex generated) pdf
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.4.x
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
: 311233 315196 315794 316139 318028 318834 319213 320016 321071 322054 322880 324575 327126 328667 330130 332105 333727 333731 335181 335392 340119 348702 372418 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-31 20:34 UTC by Mark Litchfield
Modified: 2006-11-08 12:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10

Attachments
the guilty culprit (71.56 KB, application/pdf)
2005-08-31 20:38 UTC, Mark Litchfield 		Details

Description Mark Litchfield 2005-08-31 20:34:40 UTC 
Version details: 0.4.0
Distribution/Version: Ubuntu Hoary

The following pdf opens fine, but repeatedly refreshing will always cause evince
to crash. The latex source file is sample2e.tex, the simple 3 page example file
included with latex. This is quite a serious problem, when you consider that
this is the type of pdf which is most likely to be refreshed.

Evince 0.4.0
Poppler 0.4.1




me@ubuntu:~/tex$ evince sample2e.pdf

(evince:28688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT
(object)' failed

(evince:28688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT
(object)' failed

(evince:28688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT
(object)' failed

(evince:28688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT
(object)' failed

(evince:28688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT
(object)' failed





Backtrace was generated from '/usr/local/bin/evince'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
`system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224499072 (LWP 28688)]
[New Thread -1226130512 (LWP 28689)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 62694

Thread 1 (Thread -1224499072 (LWP 28688))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance_is_a
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_object_unref
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_object_set_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_object_set
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ev_page_action_set_document
    at ev-page-action.c line 596
  • #9 ev_window_setup_document
    at ev-window.c line 695
  • #10 ev_window_load_job_cb
    at ev-window.c line 871
  • #11 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ev_job_finished
    at ev-jobs.c line 207
  • #17 notify_finished
    at ev-job-queue.c line 67
  • #18 g_child_watch_add
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_main_depth
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 main
    at main.c line 295
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Mark Litchfield





          2005-08-31 20:38:05 UTC
        



Created attachment 51634 [details]
the guilty culprit






Comment 2


Marco Pesenti Gritti





          2005-09-01 09:36:21 UTC
        



Should be fixed in cvs






Comment 3


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-09-03 22:13:27 UTC
        



*** Bug 315196 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 4


Brent Smith (smitten)





          2005-09-11 05:31:47 UTC
        



*** Bug 315794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 5


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-09-13 14:29:28 UTC
        



*** Bug 316139 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 6


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-10-05 15:29:35 UTC
        



*** Bug 318028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 7


Sebastien Bacher





          2005-10-17 16:05:34 UTC
        



*** Bug 318834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 8


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-10-19 14:37:57 UTC
        



*** Bug 319213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 9


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-11-09 19:14:00 UTC
        



*** Bug 321071 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 10


Teppo Turtiainen





          2005-11-27 12:56:07 UTC
        



*** Bug 322054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 11


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-11-30 22:17:11 UTC
        



*** Bug 322880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 12


Christian Kirbach





          2005-12-14 12:17:07 UTC
        



Yes, this is fixed in HEAD. Can you apply the patch to the
gnome-2-12 branch as well, please?






Comment 13


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-12-14 17:26:11 UTC
        



Christian, I don't think there will be gnome-2-12 release so I don't find much
sense in it.






Comment 14


Christian Kirbach





          2005-12-14 21:02:17 UTC
        



From
 http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen

February 8th 	GNOME 2.12.3 Stable Release

So there will be another 2.12 release.Or were you talking about something else?

I will mark it FIXED again - reopened it just to poke you.
I will leave the decision to you to commit it, but I have come across this
error many times. I am willing to test the patch against the 2-12 branch if you 
attach it.






Comment 15


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2005-12-20 08:50:00 UTC
        



*** Bug 324575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 16


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-01-12 15:27:43 UTC
        



*** Bug 320016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 17


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-01-12 15:29:12 UTC
        



*** Bug 311233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 18


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-01-15 21:43:11 UTC
        



*** Bug 327126 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 19


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-01-26 05:47:23 UTC
        



*** Bug 328667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 20


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-02-06 15:46:55 UTC
        



*** Bug 330130 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 21


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-02-21 23:13:36 UTC
        



*** Bug 332105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 22


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-03-07 14:41:55 UTC
        



*** Bug 333727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 23


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-03-07 14:42:14 UTC
        



*** Bug 333731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 24


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-03-20 03:33:59 UTC
        



*** Bug 335181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 25


Nickolay V. Shmyrev





          2006-03-21 18:37:48 UTC
        



*** Bug 335392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 26


Sergej Kotliar





          2006-04-30 11:03:43 UTC
        



*** Bug 340119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 27


Sergej Kotliar





          2006-07-26 00:56:40 UTC
        



*** Bug 348702 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 28


Carlos Garcia Campos





          2006-11-08 12:11:57 UTC
        



*** Bug 372418 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***